HELLENISTIC KINGDOMS: From Greece to India, Alexander the Great’s successor kingdoms

Theo Zagorakis, George Michael, Anna Vissi, Despina Vandi. These are all household names in the Greek world and a testament to Modern Greek popular culture. Seleucus Nicator, Attalus Philadelphus, Ptolemy Epiphanes, Demetrius Poliorcetes. These are certainly not household names in the Greek world. Yet they were once rulers of the various Hellenistic Kingdoms that emerged after the death of Alexander the Great in 323BC and in those days, these leaders were certainly known throughout the world.hellenistic-world-picture-from-house-of-ptolemy-website.gif

 

I would like to present to you, the reader, an overview of the Greek kingdoms that flourished before the conquest of the Roman Empire. These were great kingdoms that were also indicative of the nature of Greeks. They were “great” in the sense that they continued the work of Alexander the Great in combining Greek culture with local customs across the Eastern world from, Libya through to India, and it was due to these kingdoms that the Greek language continued to be the lingua franca of the known world. The Greek culture and language continued past Roman occupation and into the Byzantine Empire (the medieval Greek Empire). Sadly, these kingdoms displayed the typical Greek trademark, civil war and external strife with, yes you guessed it, other Greek kingdoms, a constant theme throughout Greek history.

 

At the time of his death, Alexander the Great had created a vast empire across the eastern world. He established 33 Greek settlements and he was brilliant at fusing local culture with that of the Hellenes. However, only Alexander the Great would have been capable of maintaining such an empire and upon his death, his generals, the Diadochi, which meant successors in Greek, divided the empire between themselves. After a series of wars over the next few decades, the spoils went to the following victors: Ptolemy took Egypt founding the Ptolemaic dynasty ruling from Alexandria (305BC), Antigonus established the Antogonid dynasty in Greece from Macedonia (306BC), Seleucus established the Seleucid dynasty in Syria and Mesopotamia (305BC), Philetaerus established the Attalid dynasty in Pergamon, in Asia Minor (282BC).

 

Each of these Kingdoms perpetuated the Hellenistic culture and language of Greece. It is interesting to note, that whilst these territories were not all in Greece proper, Hellenic culture flourished, more so than in the “homeland.” Significantly, the rulers of these kingdoms were Greek and generally struggled to learn native languages. For example, the only ruler to fluently speak the native dialect of Egypt was Cleopatra, the last ruler of the Ptolemaic Kingdom. Before the reader says, “wasn’t Cleopatra an Egyptian,” it is worth noting that that at no stage did the Ptolemies marry outside of their clan and all of them spoke Greek as their language.

 

The Ptolemies are arguably the most famous of all the Hellenistic dynasties. Ptolemy charged himself with the responsibility of looking after Alexander’s body as well as strengthening the newly established Greek cities of Egypt. Ptolemy ensured that the military only contained Greek troops and he increased his empire to include Palestine and Cyprus whilst his successors ventured into Asia Minor and also took control of the Greek cities of the Cyrene in Libya. The Ptolemies were patrons of the arts and sciences, which flourished throughout the empire. All the male rulers of the dynasty were named Ptolemy and the women were generally called Arsinoe, Berenice and Cleopatra. The seventh and last Cleopatra in the dynasty, which is a Greek Macedonian name, committed suicide resulting in the formal annexation of Egypt as a Roman province in 30BC. The language of the Greeks continued to be widely spoken and was greatly strengthened by the conquest of the Greeks of the Byzantine Empire in the 500’s until the late 600’s. Today, there are many Greeks who still live in Egypt, especially in Alexandria and an estimated 7% of the population is Coptic Orthodox, a result of the Byzantine Empire’s 150 year reign in the country.

 

Antigonus was another general and he initially obtained only a few regions in Asia Minor before being defeated in a battle for Alexander’s kingdoms by the other Diadochi in the Battle of Ipsus in 301BC. However, his successors eventually gained control of Greece and the dynasty would survive until 146BC. A number of wars with city-states such as Sparta and against Pyrhus of Epirus weakened the kingdom. Thus by the time the Roman Empire came into conflict with the Antigonid dynasty they were easily subdued and became the Roman province of Macedonia. The Roman Empire absorbed the Greek culture and unlike their other provinces, afforded Greece its due respect. Interestingly, Sparta was never officially occupied by the Romans.

 

The Attalid dynasty based in Pergamon in Asia Minor sprang to life after the death of the general Lysimachus in 281BC. Lysimachus held territory in that region after Alexander the Great’s death, but eventually met his death in a war with the Greeks of Seleucus. An interesting story emerged from his defeat, whereby the dog of Lysimachus watched over his master’s body for many days, not letting anyone claim it. Philetarus, an officer in Lysimachus’ military had earlier taken control of Pergamon in 282BC. The Attalids then expanded their empire in Asia Minor and claimed to be descendents of Telephos, the son of Herakles. Pergamon was a great city in its time and is worth a visit in today’s modern Turkey. The Kingdom was bequeathed to Rome in 133BC by Attalus.

 

The Seleucid Empire was certainly one of the greatest in history. At its peak the territory included Asia Minor, Palestine, Syria, Mesopotamia, Persia, Turkmenistan and the Indus Valley. The contribution of the Seleucids to history can not be underestimated for they truly implemented Alexander’s multi-cultural policy and encouraged trade from as far a field as India through to Greece. Seleucus and his successors established a number of Greek settlements in Asia with former Greek soldiers and traders, the greatest of these cities was Antioch. In fact, more settlements were established in the East than Alexander could ever have imagined and like the other Greek kingdoms, the Greek language was dominant, out lasting the Empire by hundreds of years. As to be expected by typical Greeks, the Seleucids were involved in many wars with fellow Greeks and by 60BC the Empire was finally defeated by the Romans. There are various places in former Seleucid territory where Greek speakers can still be found.

 

Other Hellenic Kingdoms that emerged well after the death of Alexander the Great, include the Pontians and the Greeks of India (yes, you heard me, the Greeks of INDIA). Pontian history is one of the great stories of Greek history. The richness and depth of their culture is still evident today and I always find it amazing that in Athens there as so many jokes about the Pontians, yet it was the brave Pontians who have maintained their culture and connection with ancient Greece much better that the Athenians could ever aspire to (this is a criticism and a story for another day). The Pontian Kingdom was founded in 301BC in Asia Minor on the Black Sea by Mithradates. Its greatest king was another Mithradates who ruled from 120BC expanding his territory across the Black Sea. After defeating the Greeks of Bithynia he fought a series of wars with the greatest of Roman generals, including Sulla, Marius and Pompey. Had he lived longer he would certainly have met Caesar in battle, alas he was defeated by Pompey in 63BC and his kingdom was absorbed by the Roman province of Cappodocia. The Pontians were later prominent in the Byzantine military and the last independent Greek Kingdom, the Empire of Trebizond which fell to the Ottomans in 1461 AD. Today, it is estimated that there are 1 million Pontians living in Black Sea countries and in Greece.

 

The Indo-Greek kingdom in the far east is arguably the most fascinating and interesting of all the Hellenistic Kingdoms. The kingdom emerged from the Greek Bactrian kingdom in Afghanistan. The Greeks of Bactria fought each other until the kingdom finally ceased to exist. However in India by about 100BC a Greek kingdom emerged whilst the most important Indo-Greek king was Menander, known as Milinda by the locals. He converted to Buddhism and encouraged the arts and sciences, resulting in a very unique style that is still evident in India today. The Indo-Greek kingdom survived until 20AD and there is a town of 4000 that believe themselves to be their descendents. This town has been the subject of documentaries and receives support from Athens. The Indo-Greek Kingdom was the last of the Hellenistic Kingdoms and a testament to Alexander the Great’s vision to bring the Greek culture to the world.

8 Comments Add yours

  1. Soula Vonness says:

    Hey guys! Great website! Very informative. I learned a lot about Greek history. Hope you’re both well.

  2. Alexander says:

    Thank you for this in depth view into the aftermath of Alexander’s empire and the cultural influences it projected, even unto this day.

    There’s a saying that that the beginning and the end are the most important parts of life.

    I would imagine this is true to today’s modern day culture, which would not have the great architecture and rich philosophy or history that Alexander the Greats’ conquest’s sealed in the sands of time. He truly is an immortal in this way – he conquered death in a way that’s more profound than misinterpretations of immortality is viewed:

    For people may die and fade, but words are cemented in time.

    Hard to live up to such a name!

  3. Singh says:

    Alexander actually lost in India…

    heres a quick resource to read for yourself http://www.boloji.com/perspective/190.htm
    if you need more literary sources just search it up, in India it is largely regarded now that Alexander never won and it was all a spin by his historians and then pushed by the British for their own imperialist measures. there are no Greek cultural influences in actual India (maybe in Afghanistan close to borders of India, but not India proper, not even Punjab proper which includes Pakistan) there is very little impact of greek culture on any archealogical evidence in India proper, do not confuse Afghanistan with India, please, it is disheartening to see credit given to Alexander where it is not due…he was simply defeated and had to turn around…think about it rationally the history and the evidence makes no sense

  4. the author says:

    In response to the comment from Singh, the point is that contemporary historians and ancient historians agree that Alexander fought hard and won his battles in India, hence he was able to control the areas in question. There is no point re-writing or falsifying history especially due to one guy providing his “perspective” on a website. There are movies on Alexander in India about his exploits and written material. Conversely research on the Indo-Greek kingdom will show how much Greek culture made its way in to India. 2 great cultures meeting, that is something to really celebrate.

    -Billy Cotsis

    1. Moda Sattva says:

      Mr. Singh is right Alexander never won in India. Infact Alexander is not known in Indian History. Throwing a question whether he came to India.
      Follow the blog post
      http://controversialhistory.blogspot.com/2007/04/myth-of-alexander-victory-in-india.html

  5. Stephanie says:

    My friend and I did a joint presentation on Bactra and Indian-Greek contact and there actually is quite a bit of material out there, whether in art, philosophy, or other even partially in diplomacy. My friend handled the art and philosophy part (specifically a Buddhist dialogue with a Greek king called Menander or Milinda), but for my part, I did a little mini study on diplomacy between Seleukos I and Chandragupta. The account goes that in exchange for 500 elephants, Chandragupta received a huge portion of Seleukos’ empire, which did include parts of India and Afghanistan. It seems to have been a pretty satisfactory agreement, since Seleukos didn’t need to worry about the east now and got a valuable addition to his arsenal, while Chandragupta received territory he had wanted anyway. Furthermore, sporadic dialog seems to have continued between at least the Ptolemies and the Mauryans, since the port of Berenike in the south of the Egyptian kingdom was a port for receiving trade from India. Even if this contact is minimal, at least there is contact and definitely space for dialog. One of the problems in this field, though, is that you have Classicists coming from the West looking for Greek influences, often without a sound knowledge of Indian studies, and Indian scholars from the East who aren’t reading what the Classicists are reading and are fed up with bad interpretations of their discipline, and who recoil from the idea that the Greeks have their hand in yet another pot. While I agree that a lot of caution should be exercised and a lot more work could be done by Classicists in familiarizing themselves with Indian studies, I don’t think you can outright deny a very small Greek presence in certain parts of India proper without first doing the informed reading.

  6. Thank you for this comment and your views. Differing Historical interpretations of particular events have been the cause of many a heated exchange — and other much more destructive events. Therefore, historical debates should be slave to just one passion: the desire for academic inquiry.

    If anyone out there would like to have their original — and verifiable — research regarding this matter posted on this blog, please email at georgemanetakis@gmail.com

    In keeping with the theme of this blog, I would be particularly interested in hearing from people who have conducted research on location.

    Thank you

    George Manetakis

  7. Bubbles says:

    I loved it!!!!!!!!! Hope to read it again some other day.@!:)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s